Palaeoproteomics resolves sloth relationships
MacPhee, Ross D. E.
- 1University of York - UK
- 2University of Chicago
- 3Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET)
- 4University of Oxford
- 5Rockefeller University
- 6Nat Hist Museum Denmark
- 7Novo Nordisk Fdn Ctr Prot Res
- 8Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Bernardino Rivadavia (MACN)
- 9Museo Municipal Ciencias Nat Lorenzo Scaglia
- 10University of California System
- 11New York State Museum & Sci Serv
- 12State University System of Florida
- 13Museo Patagonia FP Moreno
- 14
- 15Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
- 16National University of La Plata
- 17Sorbonne Universite
- 18Leibniz Institut fur Zoo und Wildtierforschung
- 19American Museum of Natural History (AMNH)
Journal
Nature Ecology and Evolution
ISSN
2397-334X
Open Access
green
Volume
3
Start page
1121
End page
1130
The living tree sloths Choloepus and Bradypus are the only remaining members of Folivora, a major xenarthran radiation that occupied a wide range of habitats in many parts of the western hemisphere during the Cenozoic, including both continents and the West Indies. Ancient DNA evidence has played only a minor role in folivoran systematics, as most sloths lived in places not conducive to genomic preservation. Here we utilize collagen sequence information, both separately and in combination with published mitochondrial DNA evidence, to assess the relationships of tree sloths and their extinct relatives. Results from phylogenetic analysis of these datasets differ substantially from morphology-based concepts: Choloepus groups with Mylodontidae, not Megalonychidae; Bradypus and Megalonyx pair together as megatherioids, while monophyletic Antillean sloths may be sister to all other folivorans. Divergence estimates are consistent with fossil evidence for mid-Cenozoic presence of sloths in the West Indies and an early Miocene radiation in South America.
Name
document.pdf
Type
Main Article
Size
2.18 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):f42d5ba1af4e34caff4520e8ff92ddf5